BBX Operating (Border to Border Exploration) Names Beech Grove (Woodbine) Field in Jasper County
Several people have mentioned BBX and they have been drilling the Magnolia Springs (Austin Chalk) in Jasper Co. since at least 2011. In late 2012 they started filing vertical wildcat permits on some of their AC units. The discovery well, Frances Kunkel #1H (vertical well), is the only well in the new Beech Grove (Woodbine) so far. The others are still Wildcats on the IP reports.The correlative interval in Beech Grove (Woodbine) is 13835'-13850'. It is a wet gas field.
The Frances Kunkel well, Lease ID #266499, is interesting because the IP was 3.621 MMcfd on a 8/64 choke with a 5553# flowing tubing pressure... from a 10' producing interval, 13848'-13848'.
The wildcat wells are much more interesting, however, because they are producing condensate.
DP #745815, Elta Williams #1, 1.081 MMcfd, 234.0 bcd, 12/64 choke, 1591# FTP, 57' PI from 13405'-13462'
DP #754951, Fistful of Dollars Unit #1, 3.240 MMcfd, 992.0 bcd, 13/64 choke, 6974# FTP, 168' PI from 13222'-13390'.
DP #764098, Fistful of Dollars North Unit #1, 3.185 MMcfd, 962.88 bcd, 11/64 choke, 7389# FTP, 106' PI, 13150'-13250' & 13330'-13336'.
Consider the BBX cat out of the bag.
Tags: BBX Operating, Jasper County, Woodbine
Views: 1858
- Attachments:
-
-
241-30831 G-5.pdf, 4 KB -
241-30834 G-5.pdf, 4 KB
-
241-30837 G-5.pdf, 4 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on
-
G-1 reports for the wildcat wells
- Attachments:
-
-
241-30831 G-1.pdf, 26 KB
-
241-30834 G-1.pdf, 25 KB
-
241-30837 G-1.pdf, 26 KB
-
-
-
-
Reports for Frances Kunkel #1
- Attachments:
-
-
241-30821 G-1.pdf, 25 KB
-
241-30821 G-5.pdf, 4 KB
-
-
-
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on -
Nice work! Only on GHS! LOL!
-
-
Permalink Reply by dbob on
-
I'm pretty exited by this as well - of note, like all development, this is not likely a continuous band of good productivity, but rather areas along a trend that do pretty well.
-
-
Permalink Reply by GoRicky on
-
Does anyone have any specific info to show this is "Eaglebine", as opposed to Woodbine Sands? I noticed that 2 of the wells had to be frac'ed. This might indicate stimulating shale(s) - ? -
-
-
Permalink Reply by dbob on
-
Ricky
As you note, the woodbine sands should produce without a frac job. RRC being what it is, re can't really be sure the otehr 2 were not fraced as well.
The frac is the best evidence that these are part of the Eaglebine concept, but keep in mind that that name was given essentially to refer to any number of different producing zones, and is really not a firm geological construct. That said, this area generally lies on trend from the Walker/Houston County area to points east. If you look at some of ZaZa's presentations that are old, this area is probably in the area they mapped as Eaglebine. This far east, I start to think of it as Teaglebine, but that is a different story.
-
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Vernon Parish
59 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
-
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
Angelina County, TX
87 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
