Does anyone know about Stedham wells? I couldn't find ip on Stedham 1H. I did find ip on 2H. Has anyone gotten division orders on these wells? Was there a problem with Stedham 1? Thanks
Tags:
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 14, 2012 at 10:00am There has not been any production reported from Stedham 1H through December and I have a note in my files that it is being used as a (pressure) monitor well. RRC seems to be experiencing "technical difficulties" this morning so I can't track down just where I got that note but I'm fairly certain that it came from the "well record only" report filed back in April last year.
Permalink Reply by ken christian on February 14, 2012 at 12:30pm Can a pressure monitor well be converted to conventional well at future date?
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 14, 2012 at 12:46pm Probably... but I don't see it as likely. This the third or fourth monitor well I've noticed in the Haynesville, so far. They are gathering science on this field and the monitor wells are part of that process, I believe.
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 14, 2012 at 12:53pm Ken,
Here is the well record for the Stedham SU #1. It is a vertical well. Scroll to the bottom of page two for the notes on the well status.
Permalink Reply by ken christian on February 16, 2012 at 8:05pm Thanks for the information. It just looked like they drilled the pressure testing well to 19,000 ft.
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 16, 2012 at 8:47pm It looks (to me) like they drilled the lateral and then plugged it off.
Permalink Reply by henry s sharp on February 16, 2012 at 9:02pm Pardon my ignorance but owning a small portion of the well I am interested. If they choose not to produce gas from the well, how do they retain their ownership?
henry sharp
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 16, 2012 at 9:53pm The unit is held by production from the Stedham 2H.
Permalink Reply by Carroll Louis thomas on March 18, 2012 at 2:45pm
Permalink Reply by Carroll Louis thomas on March 18, 2012 at 2:11pm
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on March 18, 2012 at 4:39pm Carol,
Just to keep everyone from being confused, the well you reference (260834) is a James Lime well drilled by Southwestern. The Exco Haynesville Shale wells named Stedham SU (no "a" in the first part of name) are 1H (405-30371, monitor well... no production) & 2H (405-30433, producing).
The James Lime unit boundaries may or may not correspond with the Shale unit.
Permalink Reply by Carroll Louis thomas on March 19, 2012 at 6:57am
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOHaynesvilleShale.com
advertisements

