BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP), the world’s largest mining company, agreed to acquire Petrohawk Energy Corp. for $12.1 billion in cash to extend its shale oil production in the U.S.

Melbourne-based BHP will pay Petrohawk $38.75 a share, the two companies said today in a statement. That’s 65 percent more than the Houston-based company’s closing price on July 14.

The acquisition gives BHP three assets across about one million net acres in Texas and Louisiana. BHP agreed to pay $4.75 billion in cash in February for Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s Arkansas shale gas assets to tap growth in the U.S. gas market, the world’s biggest.

“Petrohawk has a focused portfolio of three world class onshore natural gas and liquids rich shale assets,” BHP Petroleum Chief Executive J. Michael Yeager said in the statement.

Petrohawk fell 1.8 percent to close yesterday at $23.49 at in New York. BHP fell 0.1 percent to A$43.60 at the 4:10 p.m. close of Sydney trading yesterday.

The purchase would be the largest acquisition of a U.S. exploration and production company since Exxon Mobil Corp. bought XTO Energy Inc. for $34.9 billion in 2009, according to Bloomberg data.

Views: 3497

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

WOW!!!!  Thanks for the news.  Is this good news... other than the high price if you're a stockholder?

It was inevitable that independents that made an early corporate decision to go "all in" on shale gas in general, and the Haynesville in particular, would find themselves stretched by debt service and low operating margins to the point of no return.  Petrohawk had the decided bad luck to have their only major credit facility with Lehman Brothers.  When the federal government decided not to bail Lehman out and they went bankrupt, Petrohawk struggled to maintain momentum in the Haynesville Play.  This begs the question, are more shoes destined to drop this year?

 

IMO, two dynamics are at work.  The Oil Majors and companies like BHP Billiton have come to accept an energy future where natural gas plays a major role, and they have been waiting for the ongoing depressed price environment to put the "early movers" in financial distress making their shale assets available at favorable prices. 

 

Now as to whether that is good news or not.  The companies that we think of as Haynesville Shale Players, with the exception of XTO, are compelled to drill and maintain cash flow to service their considerable debt obligations.  Cash rich companies such as Exxon Mobil and BHP Billiton do not have that compelling reason.  It would make much more business sense to buy shale assets cheap and wait until the market is more favorable to produce them.  If the major energy companies acquire the existing leasehold of current Haynesville Shale companies, it could be a good news, bad news story.  The majors don't need the cash flow so they do not need to keep drilling wells where leases a HBP.  However they have the cash to continue to lease new territory and conduct step-out drilling to follow the shale to its end.  I suspect that both scenarios will occur to some extent if more Shale Players have to sell out.

Skip

 

Well said.  I'm hearing rumors of SWN selling certain lease areas to the majors.

I know that XTO is now reporting production on wells drilled recently by SWN in Shelby & Sabine Counties.  CHK wells in Panola and Harrison Counties now have NFR as operator.

Jffree

 

That report on SWN matches what I understood but I wasn't sure it was confirmed.  I'm not that familiar with NFR.  Do they have deep pockets and ability to develop gradually?

NFR Energy is Nabors Drilling and First Reserve Corp.  I'd say yes and yes.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/nabors-looks-to-sell-2-billi...

ConocoPhillips still a big player, but in a different game

By BRETT CLANTON
HOUSTON CHRONICLE

July 15, 2011, 11:20PM  ADDED EMPHASIS IS MINE.

ConocoPhillips no longer will rank among the major international oil companies after it spins off its refining business next year, but it will be the largest independent oil and gas player in the U.S. by a wide margin.

And its entry into that group will make waves.

Most notably, the move could put more pressure on smaller players to bulk up by acquiring assets or finding merger partners, analysts said.

That may be especially true of small and midsize companies in North America that have positions in highly sought-after shale gas formations but lack the capital and scale to develop them.

That scenario emerged Thursday — the same day ConocoPhillips announced its plans - when BHP Billiton Petroleum, a U.S.-based oil and natural gas arm of the Australian mining giant, said it will acquire Houston's Petrohawk Energy Corp. for $12.1 billion.

The deal may not be the last of its kind.

"This is feeling to me like we're getting to the consolidation phase," said Andrew Coleman, a managing director of oil and gas exploration and production research at Raymond James in Houston.

That trend may have begun before ConocoPhillips announced plans to create two separate publicly traded companies out of its refining and exploration-production units. The separation is expected to be complete by the second quarter of 2012.

But the Houston oil giant's move into the category of U.S. oil and gas independents underscores how companies in that group are only getting larger, even as oil majors like Chevron, Shell and BP are trimming down.

Houston's Apache Corp., for instance, spent $11 billion last year acquiring Mariner Energy and assets from BP and Devon Energy Corp.

And Marathon Oil Corp., which completed a spinoff of its refining business last month and relaunched as an independent, recently agreed to pay $3.5 billion for a swath of acreage in South Texas' Eagle Ford Shale.

Major oil companies including Exxon Mobil Corp. and Shell, along with state-owned oil giants like Norway's Statoil, have also been writing big checks to buy small companies or acreage stakes in U.S. shale formations - thought to hold 100 years' worth of natural gas as well as large quantities of oil and valuable natural gas liquids.

More than $120 billion has been spent on shale deals in the last three years, said Bob Fryklund, a vice president with IHS-Cambridge, who sees still more ahead.

"I don't think we are done, as size is everything in shale if you are a long-term player," he said.

The deals have greatly boosted the cost of entry into U.S. shales and other emerging oil and gas areas and driven up the cost of services, making it harder for little guys to compete.

"The North American exploration and production business is in the very early stages of evolving from a highly fragmented business comprised of a myriad of mid, small and private E&P companies" to one increasingly run by "world-class energy concerns," said Bill Herbert, a managing director at Houston investment bank Simmons & Company International .

Still, convincing investors that a behemoth like Conoco-Phillips is a better bet than smaller independents with more aggressive growth plans may be a tall order, said Fadel Gheit, industry analyst with Oppenheimer & Co.

"Size is no longer really a prerequisite for investors," he said. They just want a stock that performs well, he added.

brett.clanton@chron.com

Skip what kind of amazes me about Petrohawks situation is that they are still holding alot of money for severance taxes they withheld from royalty owners. Our section just has 1 Haynesville Shale well and the sev taxes to payout were 1.44 mill. If you look on Sonris at all the well sev tax exemptions and then talk to people and find out that no one has been reimbursed the sev tax by Petrohawk, were is the money. They should have millions and millions if you add the sev tax and another guy I know hasn't received any money for a well that has been producing for a year. Is BHP going to have to pay all of that for Petrohawk and do they even know of those liabilities?
This is not good news for anyone but a stockholder. Lots of Pertohawk employees will be fired and development will grind to a halt.
I agree. This is not good news.

BHP Billiton is a foreign owned behemoth with allegiance to shareholders and corporate bottom line that benefits from the decline of the American economy. This acquisition was made possible by our ineffective "jimmy the cricket" government that refuses to focus on American (owned) resources.

IMO I doubt they will fire any one---the company will continue to operate very much like XTO under XOM just with more capital to drill--- one reason this deal was rich is HK has lots acres in  liquid+ gas assets such as Eagle Ford area

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service