I would like to apologize for my 2011 remark per the following: "voluntary dismissed" means settled out of court, payoff by CHK."
I have searched and made phone calls and attempted to find even the slightest info per your suit with CHK. Nothing but the Court notation of "voluntarily dismissed." .
IMO, and strickly IMO and several personal experiences, the "voluntarily dismissed" notation has meant some kind of out of Court "deal" was reached between the parties, and most deals involved money... especially when there is no statement, comment made following the "dismissal," by the parties.
My intent, statment was not to indict you, but to cite and follow the Court cases with CHK Energy, et al, as well as cite my/our problems with CHK Energy and their treatment/accounting of/for mineral owners/royalty checks/deductions/leases, etc.
IFirst I want to thank you for publicly setting the record straight concerning your lawsuit with CHK and the Court's citation of "voluntarily dismissed."
And, Second... Thank you for setting me straight...
I hope you will be successful in your efforts to hold you attorneys accountable in this matter.
GHS is the perfect forum for these discussions, again, IMO. I hope at some point you will be able to share with us (on GHS) more of your case's background and you efforts to get to the bottom of your Case's "voluntary dismissal."
Robyn Coffey FW's Comments
Comment Wall (1 comment)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Ms Coffey,
I would like to apologize for my 2011 remark per the following: "voluntary dismissed" means settled out of court, payoff by CHK."
I have searched and made phone calls and attempted to find even the slightest info per your suit with CHK. Nothing but the Court notation of "voluntarily dismissed." .
IMO, and strickly IMO and several personal experiences, the "voluntarily dismissed" notation has meant some kind of out of Court "deal" was reached between the parties, and most deals involved money... especially when there is no statement, comment made following the "dismissal," by the parties.
My intent, statment was not to indict you, but to cite and follow the Court cases with CHK Energy, et al, as well as cite my/our problems with CHK Energy and their treatment/accounting of/for mineral owners/royalty checks/deductions/leases, etc.
IFirst I want to thank you for publicly setting the record straight concerning your lawsuit with CHK and the Court's citation of "voluntarily dismissed."
And, Second... Thank you for setting me straight...
I hope you will be successful in your efforts to hold you attorneys accountable in this matter.
GHS is the perfect forum for these discussions, again, IMO. I hope at some point you will be able to share with us (on GHS) more of your case's background and you efforts to get to the bottom of your Case's "voluntary dismissal."
And on a better foot forward... Welcome to GHS.
DrWAVeSport Cd1 3/21/2013
Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Sign Up
or Sign In
Or sign in with:
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Texas Smackover Lithium Play
Drilling Into Oblivion: Can Any Haynesville Operators Make a Decent Return at Sub-$2 Gas?
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale: Remembering the oil boom of more than a decade ago. Hope springs eternal
U.S. LNG Projects Face Steep Challenges in Replacing Coal Abroad
Haynesville Shale IPO Buzz: Investors Eye Natural Gas Gems
It’s a Bad Time to be Selling Below Average Gas Assets - Tellurian
CERA and Fossil energy conclusion
It’s never been cheaper to buy an EV. Here’s why.
Not a member? Get our email.
Weekly Shale Update
View weekly shale archives
Groups
San Augustine, TX
386 members
Rusk County
97 members
Vernon Parish
59 members
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
Cass County, TX
118 members
Angelina County, TX
87 members
Titus County
10 members