May 27, 2014 7:51 p.m. ET

A conceptual drawing of the energy complex in Lake Charles, La. C.H. Fenstermaker & Associates, LLC

Start with exotic Nazi technology, take a detour with South African apartheidists, and add a bit role for Iranian imams. What you have is—what else? —one of the most improbable and important American business stories of the past decade.

It's the tale of a company called Sasol, the former South African state oil company, which is embarking on what could be the single-largest foreign investment project in U.S. history.

Sasol is building a 3,034-acre energy complex near a bayou in Lake Charles, La. Tapping into cheap, fracked natural gas as well as the pipeline and shipping infrastructure along the Gulf Coast, Sasol plans to spend as much as $21 billion there.

It is expensive, elaborate and dirty work. Sasol plans to reduce, or "crack," the gas into ethylene, a raw chemical used in plastics, paints and food packaging. It also plans to convert the gas into high-quality diesel and other fuels, using a process once advanced by Nazi scientists to power Panzer tanks. The state of Louisiana is even kicking in $2 billion of incentives to make it happen.

Sasol CEO David Constable watched Big Board trading last month. Bloomberg News

This is engineering on a scale so large that it requires closing 26 public roads, buying out 883 public-property lots, and hiring 7,000 workers at peak construction. Some 100 additional trucks will be on the road each day once the complex is completed. Entrepreneurs have already begun construction of a "man camp" to house 4,000 temporary workers streaming into Lake Charles for this and other projects.

In that way, Sasol is a metaphor for what we don't yet understand about America's gas boom. Most know what fracking has meant for oil and gas prices. But because much of the work hasn't started yet, few appreciate the true extent of the industrialization that's about to begin.

So let's put it this way: We are building a Qatar on the Bayou. From whole cloth, companies are laying new cities of fertilizer plants, boron manufacturers, methanol terminals, polymer plants, ammonia factories and paper-finishing facilities. In computer renderings, the Sasol site looks like a fearsome, steel-fitted Angkor Wat.

In all, some 66 industrial projects—worth some $90 billion—will be breaking ground over the next five years in Louisiana, according to the Greater Baton Rouge Industry Alliance. Tens of billions of other new investments could be coming, says Louisiana's economic development secretary, Stephen Moret. How many projects will actually get built remains to be seen.

The Game

Contact him atdennis.berman@wsj.comand follow him on Twitter:@dkberman

Assuming that most will, you realize we are still probably underestimating the positive impact of the gas boom on both local and national economies. The entire GDP of the state of Louisiana is about $250 billion annually.

"As an economist, I can only say,‘'Wow. Holy Cow,'" said Loren Scott, a Louisiana economist who has studied the state for 40 years. "We typically measured expansion in terms of hundreds of millions of dollars. Something like that makes your eyes bug out." He expects, for instance, that once 10-year tax-abatement deals expire, schools boards will "find themselves with a bonanza."

Similarly, we probably underestimate the deepening shortage of skilled laborers needed to design, weld and operate these mechanical beasts. Wages are already pushing higher, which could delay or even squelch some projects.

So, too, do we not understand the environmental effects of this building binge. The Sasol plant alone is expected to emit 85 times the state's "threshold" rate of benzene each year. It will also produce massive streams of carbon dioxide and treated water. And it is just one new facility of many. "I don't want to wear a gas mask to go to bed at night if this plant is coming in," said Rufus Victorian, a pipe fitter, at a 4½-hour public hearing on the plant in March.

Amid the coming boom, Sasol's vision is especially audacious. The history of gas-to-liquid plants is mixed, prone to cost overruns and technology snafus. Should gas prices rise, or oil prices fall, they can quickly become huge money losers. Right now, the arbitrage is in Sasol's favor. Oil trades at around 24 times the price of natural gas. In 2007, by comparison, it was around seven times. Sasol needs the ratio to be at least 16 to make money.

Historically, Sasol did a lot of its work converting coal to fuel, a necessity during the apartheid era in South Africa when oil supplies were constrained by a trade embargo. The company still carries an outsider's edge, going wherever the best deals may be. That has taken it to Qatar, as well as Iran, Uzbekistan and Nigeria.

U.S. sanctions forced Sasol to leave Iran, where it purchased crude oil for a South African refinery and invested in a chemical venture with a state-backed company.

Iranian imams do not make the best bedfellows—which is partly why Sasol Chief Executive David Constable appreciates doing business in America. "If you're going to build a plant, from a logistics standpoint…it is No. 1 in the world," said Mr. Constable in an interview. Access to cheap gas, customers, capital, rule of law and ease of building "ticks all the boxes very nicely. It couldn't have happened to a better country."

Louisiana's waterways are a huge plus, making it easy for Sasol to ship its products via barge. They also make it easier to deliver the four 2,000-ton chemical reactors needed for the plants. The docks are just 1½ miles from the Sasol site.

Then there are the gas pipelines, which make it easy to pull in gas from the shale fields of Texas.

"That's why it's so much more difficult for a China or Europe to jump into shale gas in a big way. If you look at the natural-gas pipelines around the country, it's like a spider web," Mr. Constable said.

There's much more toil for both Sasol and the country at large. The environmental costs cannot be overlooked.

But in the grand veneers of politics, there is much to work with here. You can almost hear President Obama announcing his begrudging approval of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline with a line that goes something like this:

"Friends, we are taking dollars out of Iran's pockets and putting them into our own. The energy century is going to reindustrialize America, and if we do it right, this is going to be bigger than we even know."



Views: 626

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ultimately I don't think it will be the price differential of natural gas to crude that determines the success.  I don't expect NG prices to rise enough to materially affect that equation.  However GTL projects need the price of crude to be high in order to have a competitive market for their product.  If rising domestic crude production causes the price per barrel to be relatively stable below $100/BBL it will be difficult for GTL fuels to compete.  I believe it was Royal Dutch Shell that recently canceled a GTL plant in S LA for that very reason.

I do find the investments in new plants and existing plant expansions to be a major economic boost for the state.  If the plants comply with regulations regarding what they emit there should be no problems.  The article did not make clear if the project was actually in the construction phase.

skip,

your recollection as to rds explanation of their decision to punt on the proposed us gtl facility is the same as mine.

however, i don't feel their stated reason/justification is what drove their decision. rather, they've got a massive cash flow problem. just look at the lower 48 projects they've bailed on and the international ones they've kicked out the door.

and, should the administration allow foreign sale of our light sweet shale derived crude, the spread between wti and brent will be arbed to zero or close to it.

its all good for us if we could sell our lower 48 ls crude and continue to buy overseas and refine here the nastier/cheaper grades of crude our gc refineries are designed to run. note: canadian tar sands oil would fit our refineries 'pistols' very well, also.

jim

Advocates for the export of crude are not finding much success as far as I can tell.  Recently they seem to have shifted strategy and are now focusing on the export of condensate. Its tough to find enough domestic market demand for rising condensate production and it could be more profitable as an export.  There has even been some suggestion of swapping condensate for imported heavy crude that better matches refining operations.  Few casual observers seem to realize that much of the liquids produced in "oil" plays is actually condensate.

it's a funny thing, we can export all the gas liquids and derivatives we want. we also can export all of the gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, ect. that we can load on tankers, but we can't export unrefined crude.

and, you're right, our refineries aren't set up to run condensate.

that true friend of justice and the american way, us rep. edward markey of ma, is doing everything in his power to preclude any export of us crude.

What will Sasol do with 85 times the yearly allowable threshold of benzene emissions???

What I know about benzene, it is some bad stuff on humans, Sasol better figure that one out before breaking new ground.

There is a pot full of tort attorneys in Lake Charles, and they're mostly all good, many having been around this particular block before.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service